学校选择
代金券
宪章
学业成绩
自治
质量(理念)
数学教育
构造(python库)
竞赛(生物学)
政治学
心理学
经济
会计
哲学
法学
认识论
生物
计算机科学
程序设计语言
生态学
标识
DOI:10.1177/08959048231204810
摘要
Influencing major education policies in the US such as school vouchers and charter schools, market theory assumes that organizational autonomy, parental choice, and competition between schools improve the quality of education. However, whether those policies can influence the instructional core of schools is not well understood. Comparing private and public schools offers an opportunity to examine whether market-oriented assumptions hold in practice. Relying on institutional theory, this study examines whether public and private schools differ in their instructional quality and whether such differences translate into achievement advantages in the US. Using Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) surveys and achievement data, the study integrates structural equation modeling and propensity score matching to examine the latent construct of instructional quality and mitigate selection bias. Results indicate similar instructional quality in public and private schools explaining comparable student achievement by school type. Barriers to instructional change through market-oriented reforms are discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI