Efficacy of cola ingestion for oesophageal food bolus impaction: open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

医学 置信区间 撞击 优势比 不利影响 丸(消化) 随机对照试验 外科 摄入 内科学
作者
E G Tiebie,Eva P. Baerends,Tom Boeije,Philip G Frankenmolen,Heleen Lameijer,WB van den Berg,K J van Stralen,Milan L. Ridderikhof,Albert J. Bredenoord
出处
期刊: 卷期号:383: e077294-e077294 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-077294
摘要

Abstract Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of cola in resolving complete oesophageal food bolus impaction. Design Open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency departments of five Dutch hospitals at the secondary and tertiary level, between 22 December 2019 and 16 June 2022. Participants 51 adults presenting with complete oesophageal food bolus impaction, defined as a sudden inability to pass saliva after consumption of foods. Patients who ingested meat that contained bones, and patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of IV or higher were excluded. Interventions 28 patients in the intervention group were instructed to consume 25 mL cups of cola at intervals up to a maximum total volume of 200 mL. 23 patients in the control group awaited spontaneous passage. In either group, if complete resolution of symptoms did not occur, endoscopic removal was performed following current guidelines: within 6 hours for patients with complete obstruction, and within 24 hours for partial obstruction. In case of complete resolution of symptoms, elective diagnostic endoscopy was required. Main outcome measures Improvement of oesophageal food bolus obstruction as reported by patients (ie, aggregate of complete and partial passage), and evaluation of complete passage. The secondary outcome was any intervention related adverse event. Results Cola did not have a meaningful effect on the improvement of food bolus obstruction (17/28 (61%) intervention v 14/23 (61%) control; odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 3.1; relative risk reduction 0.0, 95% confidence interval −0.55 to 0.36; P>0.99). Complete passage was reported more often in the intervention group but this difference was not significant (12/28 (43%) intervention v 8/23 (35%) control; odds ratio 1.4 (0.45 to 4.4); relative risk reduction −0.23 (−1.5 to 0.39); P=0.58). No severe adverse events occurred. However, six (21%) patients in the intervention group experienced temporary discomfort after drinking cola. Conclusions In this study, cola consumption did not lead to a higher rate of improvement of complete oesophageal food bolus impaction. Given the lack of adverse events in the treatment group and some events of resolution after treatment, cola might be considered as a first line treatment, but should not delay any planning of endoscopic management. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (currently International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) NL8312.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
化学天空完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
滕侑林完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
sdl发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
乐乐应助Nancy采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
在水一方应助Gina采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
JJ好奇怪发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
乐一乐发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
庾磬完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
iyoi完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
11112233发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科研通AI6.2应助六碳烷采纳,获得10
2秒前
小确幸发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
顾烨棠发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
CipherSage应助yyyyyffff采纳,获得10
3秒前
慕青应助Lorain采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
大力云朵完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
闫江洁发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
苏荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
观澜完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
止咳糖江完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
Jasper应助upcomingbias采纳,获得30
4秒前
cdercder应助细腻戒指采纳,获得10
4秒前
风趣如松发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
清风完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
赘婿应助开朗丹雪采纳,获得10
5秒前
springlrt完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
慕青应助跳跃寄风采纳,获得10
5秒前
骆十八发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
852应助fengdengjin采纳,获得10
6秒前
隐形松完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
慧慧子完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
小宇发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
kknd发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 500
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
DIPPR Project 801 - Full Version 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7767141
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9310796
关于积分的说明 20319334
捐赠科研通 7352050
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3315202
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2464641
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2329850