双灵巧性
知识管理
文件夹
形式
意外事故
独创性
项目组合管理
业务
竞争优势
权变理论
灵活性(工程)
动态能力
过程管理
项目管理
计算机科学
营销
经济
管理
社会学
哲学
语言学
财务
定性研究
社会科学
作者
Catherine P. Killen,Shankar Sankaran,Michael Knapp,Chris Stevens
出处
期刊:International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
[Emerald Publishing Limited]
日期:2023-09-29
卷期号:16 (6/7): 743-766
被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1108/ijmpb-04-2023-0082
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore how organizations manage and integrate exploration and exploitation across the innovation project portfolio. Such ambidextrous capabilities are required for organizations to innovate and succeed in today's rapidly changing competitive environment. Understanding how exploration and exploitation projects are integrated can illustrate ways to enhance ambidexterity and boost learning for the benefit of both approaches. Design/methodology/approach A multiple-case study approach was used to explore innovation portfolio management in six large organizations that emphasize innovation in their strategies. Findings The findings draw upon concepts of paradox and contingency to reveal that the inherent tension between formality and flexibility in managing innovation project portfolios is aligned with the need for organizational ambidexterity that maintains effective exploitative innovation while supporting explorative innovation capabilities. Four integration mechanisms are identified that enhance ambidexterity across the innovation portfolio by embedding processes for transition from exploration to exploitation and cross-fertilizing knowledge to build innovation capability across both exploration and exploitation. Practical implications Managers may find inspiration on ways to enhance learning by bridging exploration and exploitation projects from the four types of integration mechanisms. Recognizing the paradoxical nature of the tension between formality and flexibility in project and portfolio management may also help guide organizations to effectively develop ambidextrous approaches to enhance overall innovation outcomes. Originality/value In contrast to perspectives which suggest that paradox and contingency approaches represent disparate perspectives, the authors demonstrate how they can complement each other and work together through innovation portfolio management to support ambidexterity at the portfolio and project levels.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI