回忆录
背景(考古学)
订单(交换)
阅读(过程)
面子(社会学概念)
认识论
非小说类
虚构理论
撒谎
文学类
近距离阅读
文学小说
哲学
艺术
语言学
历史
文学批评
经济
考古
放射科
医学
财务
出处
期刊:Prose Studies
[Routledge]
日期:2015-01-02
卷期号:37 (1): 66-82
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1080/01440357.2015.1056489
摘要
In this essay, I propose that there is a logic behind the concept of truthiness that has permeated our categorizations of fiction and nonfiction, one that can shed light on the reception of truth claims within each category. In order to understand this logic, we can look to hybrid forms of discourse, which play with the expectations we associate with fiction and nonfiction and engage with the difficulties we face when reading representations of experience. I contend that such hybrid forms use truthiness as a qualifier of fictional truth in a nonfiction context (or vice versa) in order to force us to reflect simultaneously on both fact and fiction because, they suggest, this is the only way to say something true. The essay will first explore the theoretical context implied by truthiness before going on to analyze two exemplary hybrid works by psychologist and writer Lauren Slater: Lying: A Metaphorical Memoir and Opening Skinner's Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI