透明度(行为)
问责
限制
公共资金
瓶颈
业务
过程(计算)
工作(物理)
公共关系
钥匙(锁)
系统回顾
计算机科学
开放式研究
基础(证据)
工程伦理学
知识管理
政治学
风险分析(工程)
过程管理
工程管理
最佳实践
实证研究
埃菲
数据共享
管理科学
同行评审
资助机构
工程类
作者
Sakshi Ahuja,Subhankar Mishra
标识
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13754
摘要
Research funding allocation remains a critical bottleneck in scientific advancement, yet the review process for funding proposals lacks the transparency that has revolutionized academic paper peer review. Traditional funding agencies operate with closed review systems, limiting accountability and preventing systematic improvements. We present OpenProposal, a proof-of-concept web-based platform that explores how transparency principles from OpenReview might be adapted to research funding proposal evaluation. Built using modern web technologies including Next.js , React , and Prisma , OpenProposal demonstrates the technical feasibility of public reviews, author rebuttals, and transparent decision-making while attempting to protect sensitive information such as budgets. Our platform prototype addresses key limitations identified in current funding systems by providing mechanisms for community engagement, reviewer accountability, and potential data-driven insights into peer review processes. Through system design and implementation, we explore how transparent funding review could potentially enhance scientific integrity and improve research funding decisions, though empirical validation remains necessary. This work contributes a technical foundation for transparent funding review and identifies design considerations for future research on peer review mechanisms in funding contexts.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI