医学
四分位数
植入式心律转复除颤器
心源性猝死
心力衰竭
观察研究
急诊医学
相对风险
猝死
随机对照试验
指南
内科学
置信区间
病理
作者
Wayne C. Levy,Anne S. Hellkamp,Daniel B. Mark,Jeanne E. Poole,Ramin Shadman,Todd Dardas,Jill Anderson,George Johnson,Daniel P. Fishbein,Kerry L. Lee,David T. Linker,Gust H. Bardy
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.015
摘要
The authors previously developed the Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM) in systolic heart failure patients without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)to predict the proportion of deaths that were sudden. They subsequently validated the SPRM in 2 observational ICD data sets. The objectives in the present study were to determine whether this validated model could improve identification of clinically important variations in the expected magnitude of ICD survival benefit by using a pivotal randomized trial of primary prevention ICD therapy. Recent data show that <50% of nominally eligible subjects receive guideline- recommended primary prevention ICDs. In the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial), a placebo-controlled ICD trial in 2,521 patients with an ejection fraction ≤35% and symptomatic heart failure, we tested the use of patient-level SPRM-predicted probability of sudden death (relative to that of non-sudden death) as a summary measurement of the potential for ICD benefit. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate variations in the relationship between patient-level SPRM predictions and ICD benefit. Relative to use of mortality predictions with the Seattle Heart Failure Model, the SPRM was much better at partitioning treatment benefit from ICD therapy (effect size was 2- to 3.6-fold larger for the ICD×SPRM interaction). ICD benefit varied significantly across SPRM-predicted risk quartiles: for all-cause mortality, a +10% increase with ICD therapy in the first quartile (highest risk of death, lowest proportion of sudden death) to a decrease of 66% in the fourth quartile (lowest risk of death, highest proportion of sudden death; p = 0.0013); for sudden death mortality, a 19% reduction in SPRM quartile 1 to 95% reduction in SPRM quartile 4 (p < 0.0001). In symptomatic systolic heart failure patients with a Class I recommendation for primary prevention ICD therapy, the SPRM offers a useful patient-centric tool for guiding shared decision making.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI