奇纳
医学
荟萃分析
梅德林
科克伦图书馆
系统回顾
心理干预
批判性评价
置信区间
护理部
替代医学
内科学
政治学
病理
法学
作者
Yi‐Lin Wu,Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage,Tsung Yu,Yi‐Hsuan Lin,Han‐Chang Ku,Yi‐Tseng Tsai,Ying‐Ju Chang,Nai‐Ying Ko
摘要
Abstract Aims To identify and synthesize the outcomes of nurse‐led case management interventions for improving cancer treatment. Design Systematic review with meta‐analysis. Data sources PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CEPS were searched for articles published from inception till June 2019, and search was finalized in January 2020. Review Methods The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The quality of evidence was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Outcomes were analysed by using a pool of data of 95% confidence intervals (CIs), p value and fitting model based on heterogeneity of test results. Results Eleven articles were included in the meta‐analysis. When compared with the regular care group, the nurse‐led case management group had: 1) shorter time from diagnosis to treatment by 9.07 days, 2) an improved treatment completion rates (OR = 2.45) and 3) more number of patients received hormone therapy. Conclusion The synthesized results presented that nurse‐led case management is more effective than regular care in improving treatment timeliness, treatment completion rates and hormone therapy rates.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI