催眠药
阿帕蒂尼
医学
内科学
肿瘤科
紫杉醇
养生
无容量
随机对照试验
癌症
贝伐单抗
荟萃分析
化疗
免疫疗法
作者
Ji Cheng,Ming Cai,Xiaoming Shuai,Jinbo Gao,Guobin Wang,Kaixiong Tao
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.08.001
摘要
Although paclitaxel plus ramucirumab has been recommended as the preferred second-line strategy, other regimens also display potentially comparable efficacies. Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, ASCO and ESMO meeting libraries. Randomized controlled trials featuring comparisons between different systemic treatments among previously treated patients with advanced gastric cancer were eligible for our systematic review. Network calculation were based on random-effects model and the relative ranking of each regimen was numerically indicated by P-score (CRD42018104672). Concerning second-line regimens, "paclitaxel plus olaparib" and "paclitaxel plus ramucirumab" dominated the overall survival ranking while "paclitaxel plus ramucirumab" additionally topped the hierarchy for progression-free survival. Among refractory or third-line only cases, apatinib reigned the hierarchy by significantly and insignificantly surpassing placebo and nivolumab respectively. In conclusion, paclitaxel plus ramucirumab is the optimal second-line regimen. Both apatinib and nivolumab could be potentially recommended as refractory regimens.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI