医学
睡眠(系统调用)
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
人口
澳大利亚人口
物理疗法
疾病严重程度
急诊医学
试验预测值
梅德林
重症监护医学
睡眠研究
儿科
睡眠呼吸障碍
预测效度
临床预测规则
多导睡眠图
作者
Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan,Benjamin Teng Jen Khoo,Anil Roy,Wai‐Man Liu,Tharun Kathiravan,Roelof Van Wijk
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia
[Wiley]
日期:2025-12-12
卷期号:81 (5): 655-663
被引量:2
摘要
Summary Introduction The STOP‐BANG questionnaire assesses the peri‐operative risk of obstructive sleep apnoea and relies on subjective components, which limit its reliability. The B‐APNEIC score was proposed as a more objective alternative, incorporating just four STOP‐BANG variables: BMI > 35 kg.m ‐2 ; arterial blood pressure; neck circumference > 40 cm; and witnessed breathing interruptions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the B‐APNEIC score in an Australian sleep clinic population. These findings would have important implications for use in the pre‐operative screening of obstructive sleep apnoea. Methods We enrolled participants referred for overnight diagnostic polysomnography. The STOP‐BANG questionnaire was administered and the B‐APNEIC score was extracted. The primary outcome was the predictive ability of a B‐APNEIC score ≥ 3 to detect severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Performance metrics were compared with a STOP‐BANG score ≥ 5. Results Among 274 patients, the B‐APNEIC score showed a sensitivity of 84% (95%CI 75–90%), specificity of 60% (95%CI 52–67%), positive predictive value of 56% (95%CI 48–64%) and negative predictive value of 86% (95%CI 78–91%) for predicting severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Compared with the STOP‐BANG score, the B‐APNEIC score showed superior sensitivity (84% vs. 73%); positive predictive value (56% vs. 52%); negative predictive value (86% vs. 78%); Youden Index (0.43 vs. 0.32); and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.72 (95%CI 0.66–0.77) vs. 0.66 (95%CI 0.60–0.72); p = 0.02). Both scores had similar specificity (59%). Discussion The B‐APNEIC score showed strong predictive accuracy for severe obstructive sleep apnoea and could serve as a simple, objective alternative to STOP‐BANG. While further validation in surgical populations is warranted, these findings support its use in pre‐operative screening for obstructive sleep apnoea.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI