The Hormetic Potential of GDF15 in Skeletal Muscle Health and Regeneration: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Background: Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) has been described as influencing skeletal physiology. Nevertheless, no systematic appraisal of the effect of GDF15 on skeletal muscle tissues has been developed to the present day. Objective: The aim of the present work was to review the evidence on the topic. Methods: In this preregistered systematic review (https://osf.io/wa8xr), articles were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and WebOfScience. Inclusion criteria comprised studies on humans or animal models, assessment of peripheral or local tissue GDF15 concentrations, as well as the direct expression of GDF15 in skeletal muscle, and direct or indirect correlates of GDF15 with physical activity/ sarcopenia/trophism/ function. Results: A total of 646 studies were retrieved, and 144 finally included. Molecular inducers or inhibitors of GDF15 in skeletal muscle tissues were described. GDF15 was reported to promote skeletal muscle health, metabolic homeostasis, and overall physical conditioning. In pathology, GDF15 seems to be correlated to the degree of muscle impairment and mitochondrial stress. GDF15 has also been described as having the potential to stratify patients based on clinical prognosis and functional outcome. Conclusion: A hormetic hypothesis for GDF15 on skeletal muscle was proposed. In fact, GDF15 exhibited beneficial effects when expressed at high levels facing acute stressors (i.e., “myoprotection”). Conversely, GDF15 exhibited maladaptive effects, such as chronic low-grade inflammation, when chronically expressed in pathological processes (e.g., obesity, aging). GDF15 may be a potential molecular target for disease-modifying interventions. The current review underscores the need for further research on GDF15 to elucidate its therapeutic potential across different pathological states. The study protocol, registered before data collection and analysis, can be retrieved at https://osf.io/wa8xr. It should be noted that the study deviated from the protocol after peer review, including other electronic databases beyond MEDLINE/PubMed alone.