Use of Electronic Self-Administered Bleeding Assessment Tool in Diagnosis of Pediatric Bleeding Disorders

医学 血管性血友病 血液学 病历 物理疗法 儿科 内科学 血管性血友病因子 血小板
作者
Dominder Kaur,Bryce A. Kerlin,Joseph Stanek,Sarah H. O’Brien
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:132 (Supplement 1): 2485-2485
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117782
摘要

Abstract Introduction: The utility of bleeding assessment tools (BAT) as predictors of bleeding diatheses has been well established, but their utilization in the current era of electronic medical records is limited by their tediousness. Self-administered bleeding questionnaires are increasingly recognized as valid tools for guiding coagulation evaluation, shifting the onus from physicians to patients. A recent study by Casey et al evaluated use of a self-administered pediatric bleeding questionnaire (self PBQ), but the focus was on validation of the tool for screening of von Willebrand disease, and the results have not been replicated. Also, the self-PBQ, still being pen-paper based, has similar limitations as other BATs. Our study evaluates the use of an electronic version of the self-administered pediatric bleeding questionnaire through a tablet/smart device - an "eBAT", with patients and their parents reporting the patient's bleeding symptoms prior to a hematology evaluation visit. Objectives: Primary objective was to determine the accuracy of the patient/parent self-administered eBAT by determining the level of agreement between patient/parent response and physician interview based response to the same bleeding report questionnaire (P-BAT). Methods: New patients referred to a pediatric hematology clinic for evaluation of a possible bleeding disorder were approached to participate in this study. Consenting families answered the bleeding questionnaires twice - once via a self-administered eBAT questionnaire on a tablet device via REDCap® and once through a physician administered version. The participants were randomly assigned to completing the eBAT first or the P-BAT first. The questionnaire utilized has been validated for use for minimum grade 4 reading level and patients older than 9 years of age were allowed to respond to the questionnaire themselves with help from their parents. We carried out an interim analysis as designed a priori for the study results. We assessed the correlation between eBAT and P-BAT scores and calculated the Spearman's correlation coefficient and Cochran's Kappa statistic (≥ 0.6 reflecting substantial and ≥0.9 reflecting almost perfect degrees of agreement). Results: As part of the interim analysis, we studied 48 questionnaire response pairs. Median age of subjects was 12.8 years (range: 0.04 - 20.99). The median time required for patients or parents to complete the eBAT was 6 minutes (2 - 28), with only 25% patients (n=12) requiring longer than 10 mins. There was very strong correlation of bleeding scores noted when comparing eBAT and P-BAT scores, (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.94, Figure 1). A weighted Kappa statistic for the comparison between self eBAT and P-BAT was 0.697; indicating substantial agreement between the bleeding scores based upon physician interviews and self-reported symptoms (p-value <0.0001). On the eBAT, 75% (n=36) of patients had scores considered abnormal for children (≥3), whereas 68.8% (n=33) of patients had abnormal scores with the P-BAT (p=0.25). Out of this population, 43.8% (n=21) of patients had a specific bleeding diathesis diagnosis (von Willebrand disease or low von Willebrand factor levels, n=8, platelet function abnormality or platelet storage pool disease, n=6, other factor deficiencies, n=5 or transient coagulation abnormalities due to inhibitors, n=2). The eBAT scored per the self-PBQ based key had a sensitivity of 77.3% (95 % CI 54.6 - 92.2%), a specificity of 28% (95 % CI 12.1 - 49.4%), a positive predictive value of 48.6% (95 % CI 40.4 - 56.9%) and a negative predictive value of 58.33 % (95% CI: 34.12 - 79.10%) for identifying a bleeding disorder. Conclusions & Future Directions: In a pediatric hematology specialty clinic setting, the information gained from the eBAT was noted to be very comparable to the physician administered bleeding questionnaire in this interim analysis, with 75% of participants being able to complete the eBAT in under 10 minutes. The clinical application of eBAT has the potential to improve utilization of bleeding scores in the evaluation of patients with possible bleeding diatheses by addressing the limitations of a paper-pen based survey. Future work will focus on translating the electronic information from the eBAT to the patient medical record in real time, in the form of pertinent history data and bleeding scores. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
漂亮的听白完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
黄黄发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Pan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
aaa完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
yangqiaozhe完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
4秒前
初景发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
米豆爸发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
彭于晏应助酷酷的听枫采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
DW应助mingfei采纳,获得10
5秒前
悲伤土豆发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
tgg发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
DW应助长风采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Frank应助包容耳机采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助略略略采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Leo发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
weiwei发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
学术底层完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
NexusExplorer应助欣喜面包采纳,获得10
8秒前
追寻夜白完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
niming发布了新的文献求助200
9秒前
9秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小龙采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
yangy801017发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
传奇3应助助兴者采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
宿舍发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Industrial Hydraulics Manual (7th edition) 800
Physiologic races of the downy mildew fungus on soybeans in North Carolina 800
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7775035
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9317028
关于积分的说明 20354362
捐赠科研通 7361358
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3317895
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2466098
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2333177