Marginal and Internal Fit of Copings Made by CAD/CAM using Different Scanning Methods

구강내 스캔(Group 1), 모델 광학 스캔(Group 2)과 모델 접촉식 스캔(Group 3)방식으로 각각 zirconia 코핑을 제작하여 광학 현미경으로 적합성을 관찰하였다. 측정항목은 변연오차(absolute marginal discrepancy;AMD), 변연간극(marginal gap; MG), 측방간격(gap of axial wall; GA), 선각간격(gap of line angle; GL)와 교합간격(gap of occusal surface; GO)이었으며, 결과는 아래와 같았다. 1. Group 1, Group 2, Group 3의 평균 AMD는 각 각 $141.21{\pm}42.94{\mu}m$, $140.63{\pm}31.64{\mu}m$, $109.37{\pm}28.42{\mu}m$이고, Group1, Group 2, Group 3의 MG는 각 각 $82.52{\pm}43.99{\mu}m$, $90.28{\pm}27.93{\mu}m$, $66.55{\pm}28.77{\mu}m$였다. AMD와 MG는 각 그룹에서 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보여주지 않았다(Anova test, P>0.05). 2. Group 2의 GA가 Group 1과 Group 3에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 적은 수치를 나타내었다(Anova test, P<0.05). 3. Group 1의 GL과 GO가 다른 그룹에 비해 통계학적으로 높은 수치를 나타내었다(Mann-whitney test(P<0.05). 세 가지 스캔 방식으로 제작된 zirconia 코핑은 세라믹 보철의 가장 중요한 평가 요소인 AMD와 MG에서 서로 통계학적 차이를 보이지 않았다. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of coping made by CAD/CAM using different scanning methods. Zirconia coping was made by each CAD/CAM system followed by intra-oral scanning, model optical scanning and model contact scanning. It was embedded into Epoxy Resin and was cut by buccal to lingual. AMD (Absolute marginal discrepancy), MG (Marginal gap), GA (Gap of axial), GL (Gap of line angle) and GO (Gap of occlusal) of each sample were measured. The result is as followed; 1. The mean value of AMD in Group 1, Group 2, Group 3 are $141.21{\pm}42.94{\mu}m$, $140.63{\pm}31.64{\mu}m$, $109.37{\pm}28.42{\mu}m$. The averages of MG in Group 1, Group 2, Group 3 are $82.52{\pm}43.99{\mu}m$, $90.28{\pm}27.93{\mu}m$, $66.55{\pm}28.77{\mu}m$. Statistically there is no difference in AMD and MG among the three Groups (Anova, P>0.05). 2. GA of Group 2 revealed statistically difference compared with Group 1 and Group 3 (Anova, P<0.05). 3. GL and GO of Group 1 showed statistically significant differences compared with Group 2 and Group 3 (Mann-whitney test (P<0.05). Zirconia copings made by 3 ways of scanning methods have no difference with conventional ceramics in AMD and MG which are known as the most important factors.