The Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Obesity

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) lead to substantial weight loss and pain reduction in persons with knee osteoarthritis and obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 2 GLP1RAs, semaglutide and tirzepatide, for patients with osteoarthritis and obesity. DESIGN: Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated microsimulation model of knee osteoarthritis, to estimate lifetime benefits and costs of weight loss strategies. DATA SOURCES: Published data to derive treatment-related weight loss, pain reduction, and costs of GLP1RAs from the U.S. Office of Health Policy. TARGET POPULATION: . TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care, societal. INTERVENTION: Semaglutide, tirzepatide, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and diet and exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Tirzepatide provided greater health benefits at lower costs than semaglutide and yielded a $57 400 per QALY ICER versus diet and exercise. For those eligible, RYGB provided greater health benefits at lower costs than the 2 GLP1RAs and had a $30 700 per QALY ICER versus LSG. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Tirzepatide's ICER was most sensitive to changes in medication costs, treatment efficacy, and cohort baseline BMI. Tirzepatide had a 64% and semaglutide had a 34% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 per QALY threshold. LIMITATION: Data from multiple sources. CONCLUSION: Both tirzepatide and semaglutide would be widely considered cost-effective when compared directly with usual care. Tirzepatide would offer the most favorable return on investment to decision makers whose cost-effectiveness thresholds exceed $57 400 per QALY. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Arthritis Foundation and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.