美波利祖马布
奥马佐单抗
苯拉唑马布
杜皮鲁玛
医学
内科学
哮喘
免疫学
儿科
免疫球蛋白E
嗜酸性粒细胞
抗体
作者
Ioana Agache,Jessica Beltrán,Cezmi A. Akdiş,Mübeccel Akdiş,Carlos Canelo‐Aybar,Giorgio Walter Canonica,Thomas B. Casale,Tomás Chivato,Jonathan Corren,Stefano Del Giacco,Thomas Eiwegger,Davide Firinu,James E. Gern,Eckard Hamelmann,Nicola A. Hanania,Mika J. Mäkelä,Irene Hernández‐Martín,Parameswaran Nair,Liam O’Mahony,Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
出处
期刊:Allergy
[Wiley]
日期:2020-02-08
卷期号:75 (5): 1023-1042
被引量:388
摘要
Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV1 , without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV1 . More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI