随机对照试验
定性性质
考试(生物学)
定制
焦虑
临床心理学
干预(咨询)
主题分析
心理学
定性研究
医学
精神科
外科
生物
社会学
机器学习
社会科学
计算机科学
政治学
法学
古生物学
作者
Susan Brown,Cornelia Ploeger,Boliang Guo,Juliana J. Petersen,Amy Beckenstrom,Michael Browning,Gerard R. Dawson,Jürgen Deckert,Rebecca Dias,Colin T. Dourish,Philip Gorwood,Jonathan Kingslake,Andreas Menke,Víctor Pérez,Andreas Reif,Henricus G. Ruhé,Judit Simon,Michael Stäblein,Anneke van Schaik,Dick J. Veltman
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152467
摘要
The qualitative and quantitative results are generally consistent. The Test's unexpected properties may explain why the RCT showed little effect, as properties were experienced across both trial arms. Beyond the RCT, the qualitative data sheds light on measurement reactivity, i.e., how measurements of depression can impact patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI