Effects of magnesium, phosphate, or zinc supplementation in intensive care unit patients—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

医学 荟萃分析 相对风险 随机对照试验 重症监护室 置信区间 临床试验 重症监护医学 内科学 系统回顾 出版偏见 梅德林 政治学 法学
作者
Gitte Kingo Vesterlund,Thomas Steen Jensen,Karen Louise Ellekjær,Morten Hylander Møller,Thordis Thomsen,Anders Perner
出处
期刊:Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica [Wiley]
卷期号:67 (3): 264-276 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/aas.14186
摘要

Low-serum levels of magnesium, phosphate, and zinc are observed in many intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but clinical equipoise exists regarding supplementation strategies. We aimed to assess the desirable and undesirable effects of supplementation with magnesium, phosphate, or zinc in adult ICU patients.We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of supplementation with magnesium, phosphate, or zinc in adult ICU patients. Primary outcomes were mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation. We registered the protocol, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement, used the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool, and the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence.We identified no low risk of bias trials. For magnesium supplementation, we included three trials (n = 235); the relative risk (RR) for mortality was 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.96 compared to no supplementation (very low certainty of evidence). For zinc supplementation, two trials were included (n = 168); the RR for mortality was 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.28 compared to control. No trials assessed the effects of phosphate supplementation on mortality. For outcomes other than mortality, only zero or one trial was available.In adult ICU patients, the certainty of evidence for the effects of supplementation with magnesium, phosphate, or zinc was very low. High-quality trials are needed to assess the value of supplementation strategies in these patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
简单的天空应助七宝采纳,获得10
刚刚
Lucas应助七里香采纳,获得30
1秒前
米卡米卡发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
skr完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助Miraitowa采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
Tang Yuanfei完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
诚心若血完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
fdawn完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
深情安青应助LIU采纳,获得10
3秒前
传奇3应助空中马铃薯采纳,获得10
3秒前
聪慧曼文完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
琳琳发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
星辰大海应助Prospect采纳,获得10
5秒前
ygtwy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
花怜发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
汉堡包应助标致的怜寒采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
枫叶发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
忧心的翎完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
苗条的依珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
英俊的铭应助cgh采纳,获得10
9秒前
酷波er应助积极的初南采纳,获得10
10秒前
jeatit发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
阿秋u发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
xxl2000发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
潇洒的元风完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
孤独的小菜鸟完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
XX应助别养死我的花采纳,获得10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7724786
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9277374
关于积分的说明 20121560
捐赠科研通 7301254
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3301510
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2454922
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2309236