医学
颈动脉内膜切除术
无症状的
狭窄
冲程(发动机)
血管成形术
动脉内膜切除术
随机对照试验
随机化
临床终点
外科
心脏病学
中期分析
内科学
机械工程
工程类
作者
Tilman Reiff,Hans‐Henning Eckstein,Ulrich Mansmann,Olav Jansen,Gustav Fraedrich,Harald Mudra,Dittmar Böckler,Michael Böhm,H. Brückmann,ES Debus,Jens Fiehler,Werner Lang,K. Mathias,EB Ringelstein,Jürg Schmidli,Robert Stingele,Ralf Zahn,Thomas Zeller,Andreas Hetzel,Ulf Bodechtel
标识
DOI:10.1177/1747493019833017
摘要
The low sample size of this prematurely stopped trial of 513 patients implies that its power is not sufficient to show that CEA or CAS is superior to a modern medical therapy (BMT) in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with an asymptomatic carotid stenosis up to one year after treatment. Also, no evidence for differences in safety between CAS and CEA during the first year after treatment could be derived. Follow-up will be performed up to five years. Data may be used for pooled analysis with ongoing trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI