医学
放射治疗
头颈部癌
数据提取
检查表
批判性评价
系统回顾
荟萃分析
梅德林
临床试验
医学物理学
外科
内科学
病理
替代医学
认知心理学
法学
心理学
政治学
作者
Toshihiko Takada,Makbule Tambaş,E. Clementel,Artuur Leeuwenberg,Marjan Sharabiani,Johanna AAG Damen,Zoë S Dunias,Jan F. Nauta,Demy L. Idema,Jungyeon Choi,Lotta Meijerink,Johannes A. Langendijk,Karel Moons,Ewoud Schuit
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd014745.pub2
摘要
Amongst 592 developed models, a limited number had adequate quality. Only one-fifth were externally validated, of which, only nine models at least twice. These nine models showed acceptable discriminative performance at external validation. However, their calibration performance was not always reported. Furthermore, most validation studies were judged as having high ROB, mainly due to problems in the analysis domain. In conclusion, this review shows the need for more external validation studies before the implementation of developed models in clinical practice and improvement of the quality of conducting and reporting of prediction model studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI