规范性
政治
凤凰
宏
经济
制度变迁
政治经济学
经济体制
实证经济学
政治学
法学
公共行政
病理
大都市区
医学
程序设计语言
计算机科学
标识
DOI:10.1080/13501763.2012.709007
摘要
This contribution reassesses the evolution of the Swedish model since the 1970s across different institutional spheres. It addresses two questions. Firstly, why did a system that was based on strong complementarities undergo such extensive changes? Secondly, what explains Sweden's recent return to strong social and economic performance? The decline of the Swedish model is explained by the endogenous nature of change, which was sparked off by 'normative dissonances' that led actors to 'defect' from crucial institutions, leading to knock-on effects on other spheres through changing political strategies and macro-level political coalitions. It is further argued that the new complementarities that have emerged after 1995, while providing new sectors with institutional advantages, also contain sources of normative dissonances, which make the long-term viability of the 'new model' doubtful.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI