The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review

检查表 医学 梅德林 背景(考古学) 重症监护室 批判性评价 谵妄 重症监护 系统回顾 重症监护医学 替代医学 病理 心理学 政治学 法学 认知心理学 生物 古生物学
作者
Ethan J. Erikson,Daniel A. Edelman,Fiona M. Brewster,Stuart Duncan Marshall,Maryann C. Turner,Vineet V. Sarode,David J. Brewster
出处
期刊:Critical Care [BioMed Central]
卷期号:27 (1): 468-468 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2
摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive volume of research published on checklists in the intensive care unit (ICU), no review has been published on the broader role of checklists within the intensive care unit, their implementation and validation, and the recommended clinical context for their use. Accordingly, a scoping review was necessary to map the current literature and to guide future research on intensive care checklists. This review focuses on what checklists are currently used, how they are used, process of checklist development and implementation, and outcomes associated with checklist use. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, followed by a grey literature search. The abstracts of the identified studies were screened. Full texts of relevant articles were reviewed, and the references of included studies were subsequently screened for additional relevant articles. Details of the study characteristics, study design, checklist intervention, and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2046 studies, of which 167 were selected for further analysis. Checklists identified in these studies were categorised into the following types: rounding checklists; delirium screening checklists; transfer and handover checklists; central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention checklists; airway management checklists; and other. Of 72 significant clinical outcomes reported, 65 were positive, five were negative, and two were mixed. Of 122 significant process of care outcomes reported, 114 were positive and eight were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Checklists are commonly used in the intensive care unit and appear in many clinical guidelines. Delirium screening checklists and rounding checklists are well implemented and validated in the literature. Clinical and process of care outcomes associated with checklist use are predominantly positive. Future research on checklists in the intensive care unit should focus on establishing clinical guidelines for checklist types and processes for ongoing modification and improvements using post-intervention data.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
坚强三德完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小泽发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
可可可完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
yuan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
月亮发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
ee发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
乐乐的应助被MMM采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
王铭发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wxnice发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
边zozo发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
晚枫完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
郇郇完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
5322完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
大模型的应助被w7采纳,获得10
3秒前
那个人完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
陆诗邈完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
课题组刀刃完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
坚强三德发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
lllkkk完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大个的应助被Song采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
我爱科研完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
平常莆完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
fei完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
呱牛完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
小马甲的应助被Victorzhou采纳,获得10
6秒前
小胚芽发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
斯文败类的应助被HM采纳,获得10
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Sustainable Engineered Micro/Nanofibers and Hybrid Nanocomposites for Environmental Remediation 400
Ecotourism 400
Liquidus diagram and viscosity estimation in pseudo-binary system Li2B6O10–LiF 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8076891
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9494848
关于积分的说明 21383642
捐赠科研通 7645068
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3400323
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2529905
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2438897