Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessment: A Comparison of Four Scales in Chinese Adults

医学 强度(物理) 止痛药 麻醉 物理疗法 麻醉学 量子力学 物理
作者
Li Li,Xueqin Liu,Keela Herr
出处
期刊:Pain Medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:8 (3): 223-234 被引量:239
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x
摘要

To determine the psychometric properties and applicability of four pain scales in Chinese postoperative adults.A prospective clinical study.A university-affiliated hospital.In total, 173 Chinese patients (age range 18-78 years) undergoing scheduled surgery.Recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated preoperatively with a visual analog scale (VAS), a numeric rating scale (NRS), a verbal descriptor scale (VDS), and the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). From the day of surgery to the sixth postoperative day, patients were interviewed for the scores of current operative pain intensity and the worst, least, and average pain on that day. On the sixth postoperative day, retrospective ratings over the 7 days were also obtained and tool preferences were investigated.Scale reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Scale validity was assessed by correlations between scales, analysis of variance with repeated measures, and the sensitivity of the scales to interventions. Chi-square tests were used to investigate if error rate and preference rate were related to gender, age, and educational level.All four pain intensity scales had good reliability and validity when used with Chinese adults. The ICCs of the four scales across current, worst, least, and average pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.673-0.825), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r = 0.71-0.99). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed significant decreases in scores associated with postoperative days, and all four scales were sensitive in evaluating analgesic efficacy. Both the VDS and the FPS-R had low error rates. Nearly half of the participants (48.1%) preferred the FPS-R, followed by the NRS (24.4%), the VDS (23.1%), and the VAS (4.4%); however, no significant differences were noted in terms of gender, age, and educational level.These findings demonstrate that although all four scales can be options for Chinese adults to report pain intensity, the FPS-R appears to be the best one. Providing tool options to address individual needs or preferences is suggested.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
eryuepiaoling发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
冬瓜鑫发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
蔡徐坤完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
NexusExplorer应助osteoclast采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
初景应助敏ming采纳,获得20
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
awa606发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助可爱的胖丁采纳,获得30
4秒前
ln发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
crethy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Lucas应助omega采纳,获得10
6秒前
lx应助小明采纳,获得10
8秒前
wanci应助困困魚采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
WYY发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
清爽的海雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
林克发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
13秒前
elgar612发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
达达尼尔发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
14秒前
orixero应助111采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
liuxinyu发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
GGGirafe发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
丘比特应助碧蓝之柔采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
冷傲的凡阳完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助WYY采纳,获得10
18秒前
Jasper应助karaha采纳,获得10
18秒前
Haoru_Lu应助wwwwyx采纳,获得30
18秒前
LL发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7286922
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907014
关于积分的说明 18849491
捐赠科研通 6955992
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208456
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378440
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184181