Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessment: A Comparison of Four Scales in Chinese Adults

医学 强度(物理) 止痛药 麻醉 物理疗法 麻醉学 量子力学 物理
作者
Li Li,Xueqin Liu,Keela Herr
出处
期刊:Pain Medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:8 (3): 223-234 被引量:239
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x
摘要

To determine the psychometric properties and applicability of four pain scales in Chinese postoperative adults.A prospective clinical study.A university-affiliated hospital.In total, 173 Chinese patients (age range 18-78 years) undergoing scheduled surgery.Recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated preoperatively with a visual analog scale (VAS), a numeric rating scale (NRS), a verbal descriptor scale (VDS), and the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). From the day of surgery to the sixth postoperative day, patients were interviewed for the scores of current operative pain intensity and the worst, least, and average pain on that day. On the sixth postoperative day, retrospective ratings over the 7 days were also obtained and tool preferences were investigated.Scale reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Scale validity was assessed by correlations between scales, analysis of variance with repeated measures, and the sensitivity of the scales to interventions. Chi-square tests were used to investigate if error rate and preference rate were related to gender, age, and educational level.All four pain intensity scales had good reliability and validity when used with Chinese adults. The ICCs of the four scales across current, worst, least, and average pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.673-0.825), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r = 0.71-0.99). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed significant decreases in scores associated with postoperative days, and all four scales were sensitive in evaluating analgesic efficacy. Both the VDS and the FPS-R had low error rates. Nearly half of the participants (48.1%) preferred the FPS-R, followed by the NRS (24.4%), the VDS (23.1%), and the VAS (4.4%); however, no significant differences were noted in terms of gender, age, and educational level.These findings demonstrate that although all four scales can be options for Chinese adults to report pain intensity, the FPS-R appears to be the best one. Providing tool options to address individual needs or preferences is suggested.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
文静的如娆完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
震动的平松完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
星辰大海应助宋丽娟采纳,获得10
刚刚
jjh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
WYN发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
ZYC完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
乐观小之完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
风笛发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
方圆学术完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
凉空气完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
陈宇发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
辣椒发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
山高发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
jjh完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
17秒前
hg08完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
成就千易发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
搜集达人应助皮皮鲁采纳,获得10
22秒前
科研通AI5应助俭朴尔岚采纳,获得10
23秒前
淡淡书白完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
25秒前
26秒前
小粉丝发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
CipherSage应助陈晓迪1992采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
勤劳怜寒完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
皮皮鲁发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
成就千易完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3780127
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3325442
关于积分的说明 10223131
捐赠科研通 3040629
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668938
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798857
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758623