Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessment: A Comparison of Four Scales in Chinese Adults

医学 强度(物理) 止痛药 麻醉 物理疗法 麻醉学 量子力学 物理
作者
Li Li,Xueqin Liu,Keela Herr
出处
期刊:Pain Medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:8 (3): 223-234 被引量:239
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x
摘要

To determine the psychometric properties and applicability of four pain scales in Chinese postoperative adults.A prospective clinical study.A university-affiliated hospital.In total, 173 Chinese patients (age range 18-78 years) undergoing scheduled surgery.Recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated preoperatively with a visual analog scale (VAS), a numeric rating scale (NRS), a verbal descriptor scale (VDS), and the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). From the day of surgery to the sixth postoperative day, patients were interviewed for the scores of current operative pain intensity and the worst, least, and average pain on that day. On the sixth postoperative day, retrospective ratings over the 7 days were also obtained and tool preferences were investigated.Scale reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Scale validity was assessed by correlations between scales, analysis of variance with repeated measures, and the sensitivity of the scales to interventions. Chi-square tests were used to investigate if error rate and preference rate were related to gender, age, and educational level.All four pain intensity scales had good reliability and validity when used with Chinese adults. The ICCs of the four scales across current, worst, least, and average pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.673-0.825), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r = 0.71-0.99). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed significant decreases in scores associated with postoperative days, and all four scales were sensitive in evaluating analgesic efficacy. Both the VDS and the FPS-R had low error rates. Nearly half of the participants (48.1%) preferred the FPS-R, followed by the NRS (24.4%), the VDS (23.1%), and the VAS (4.4%); however, no significant differences were noted in terms of gender, age, and educational level.These findings demonstrate that although all four scales can be options for Chinese adults to report pain intensity, the FPS-R appears to be the best one. Providing tool options to address individual needs or preferences is suggested.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Jasper应助的后果采纳,获得10
刚刚
贪玩的吐司完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
温暖砖头发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
高挑的果汁完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1222发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
xiaohu完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
moumojo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
无限亦云发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
铱铱的胡萝卜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
斯文发夹发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
cdercder应助slx采纳,获得20
7秒前
紧张的铅笔完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
包容的白云完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
赵吉思汗发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
田様应助潺潺流水采纳,获得10
8秒前
酷炫的小鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
炙热从蕾发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
无花果应助aoyo采纳,获得10
11秒前
打打应助WOLF采纳,获得10
11秒前
华仔应助斯文元正采纳,获得10
12秒前
Wss完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
crethy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
15秒前
彭于晏应助哦_采纳,获得10
17秒前
上官若男应助认真的可冥采纳,获得10
18秒前
lhxie完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
Wss发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
开朗的蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Snowy周完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7287149
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907097
关于积分的说明 18850012
捐赠科研通 6956199
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208502
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378495
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184219