Comparison Between Optimal Pulsed Technology and Meibomian Gland Massage Treatment for Contact Lens–Related Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of optimal pulsed technology (OPT) and meibomian gland massage (MGM) in alleviating the signs and symptoms of contact lens-related meibomian gland dysfunction (CL-MGD). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study included 90 patients (180 eyes) diagnosed with CL-MGD and were assigned to the OPT group (n = 60 eyes), MGM group (n = 60 eyes), and control group (n = 60 eyes). All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), and day 42 (D42) for the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), noninvasive tear meniscus height (NITMH), meibomian gland score (MGS), meibomian gland score (MGYSS), best-corrected visual acuity, and intraocular pressure. Results: The OSDI scores and NITBUT improved after treatment in all the three groups. The OSDI scores in OPT and MGM groups were significantly lower compared with that in the control group at D21 and further decreased at D42. The NITBUT in OPT and MGM groups increased compared with the control group at D21 and further increased at D42, and the NITBUT in OPT group increased compared with the MGM group at D21 and D42. The MGYSS both improved after treatment in the OPT and MGM groups, The MGYSS in OPT and MGM groups decreased compared with the control group at D21 and further decreased at D42, and the MGYSS in the OPT group decreased compared with the MGM group at D21 and D42. The NITMH and MGS had no differences after treatment. Conclusions: Results imply that OPT or MGM treatment can be safely used to relieve symptoms of CL-MGD. In addition, OPT treatment was found to be more effective in improving the general stability of the tear-film in CL-MGD.