European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

指南 观察研究 冲程(发动机) 随机对照试验 医学 分级(工程) 人口 心理干预 家庭医学 系统回顾 梅德林 内科学 外科 精神科 病理 环境卫生 工程类 土木工程 法学 机械工程 政治学
作者
Thorsten Steiner,Jan Purrucker,Diana Aguiar de Sousa,Trine Apostolaki‐Hansson,Jürgen Beck,Hanne Christensen,Charlotte Cordonnier,Matthew B. Downer,Helle Eilertsen,Rachael Gartly,Stefan T. Gerner,Leonard Ho,Silje Holt Jahr,Catharina J.M. Klijn,Nicolas Martinez‐Majander,Kateriine Orav,Jessica Petersson,Andreas Raabe,Else Charlotte Sandset,Floris H.B.M. Schreuder
出处
期刊:European stroke journal [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:10 (4): 1007-1086 被引量:65
标识
DOI:10.1177/23969873251340815
摘要

Abstract Spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) affects ~3.4 million people worldwide each year, causing ~2.8 million deaths. Many randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies have added to the evidence base for the management of people with ICH since the last European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous ICH were published in 2014, so we updated the ESO guideline. This guideline update was guided by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedures for guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, in collaboration with the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). We identified 37 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions and prioritised clinical outcomes. We conducted systematic literature searches, tailored to each PICO, seeking randomised controlled trials (RCT) – or observational studies when RCTs were not appropriate, or not available – that investigated interventions to improve clinical outcomes. A group of co-authors allocated to each PICO screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data from included studies. A methodologist conducted study-level meta-analyses and created summaries of findings tables. The same group of co-authors graded the quality of evidence, and drafted recommendations that were reviewed, revised and approved by the entire group. When there was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, each group of co-authors drafted an expert consensus statement, which was reviewed, revised and voted on by the entire group. The systematic literature search revealed 115,647 articles. We included 208 studies. We found strong evidence for treatment of people with ICH on organised stroke units, and secondary prevention of stroke with blood pressure lowering. We found weak evidence for scores for predicting macrovascular causes underlying ICH; acute blood pressure lowering; open surgery via craniotomy for supratentorial ICH; minimally invasive surgery for supratentorial ICH; decompressive surgery for deep supratentorial ICH; evacuation of cerebellar ICH > 15 mL; external ventricular drainage with intraventricular thrombolysis for intraventricular extension; minimally invasive surgical evacuation of intraventricular blood; intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent proximal deep vein thrombosis; antiplatelet therapy for a licensed indication for secondary prevention; and applying a care bundle. We found strong evidence against anti-inflammatory drug use outside of clinical trials. We found weak evidence against routine use of rFVIIa, platelet transfusions for antiplatelet-associated ICH, general policies that limit treatment within 24 h of ICH onset, temperature and glucose management as single measures (outside of care bundles), prophylactic anti-seizures medicines, and prophylactic use of temperature-lowering measures, prokinetic anti-emetics, and/or antibiotics. New evidence about the management of ICH has emerged since 2014, enabling this update of the ESO guideline to provide new recommendations and consensus statements. Although we made strong recommendations for and against a few interventions, we were only able to make weak recommendations for and against many others, or produce consensus statements where the evidence was insufficient to guide clinical decisions. Although progress has been made, many interventions still require definitive, high-quality evidence, underpinning the need for embedding clinical trials in routine clinical practice for ICH.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
快乐的千兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
秦秦秦完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
不信人间有白头完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
10秒前
风信子deon01发布了新的文献求助200
12秒前
TTT完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
JiaMX应助韩.采纳,获得10
15秒前
CJW完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
黑咖啡完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
26秒前
一只特立独行的猪完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
gxzsdf完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
hellozijia完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
loong完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
44秒前
毛豆应助风清扬采纳,获得10
44秒前
Copyright应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
蔡从安发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
manmanzhong完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
57秒前
今天看文献了没完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
刘家那个宝完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
尚奇发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
zyq发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
谦谦呆滴完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
钉钉完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
casey完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
悬铃木完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Jerry完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
早睡完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Liii完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Sweet完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
柏柏应助科研爱好者采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.4应助四壁雪采纳,获得10
1分钟前
RaeganWehe完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7257699
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8879580
关于积分的说明 18757472
捐赠科研通 6938054
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201146
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375264
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176952