白癜风
组内相关
等级间信度
医学
报销
比例(比率)
皮肤病科
结构效度
临床心理学
评定量表
统计
心理测量学
数学
地图学
医疗保健
地理
经济
经济增长
作者
Nanja van Geel,Albert Wolkerstorfer,Khaled Ezzedine,Amit G. Pandya,Marcel W. Bekkenk,Lynda Grine,Sarah Van Belle,Janny E. Lommerts,Iltefat Hamzavi,John E. Harris,Viktoria Eleftheriadou,Samia Esmat,Hee Young Kang,Prasad Kumarasinghe,Cheng‐Che E. Lan,Davinder Parsad,Noufal Raboobee,Leihong Xiang,Tamio Suzuki,C.A.C. Prinsen
摘要
Abstract Currently, vitiligo lacks a validated Physician Global Assessment (PGA) for disease extent. This PGA can be used to stratify and interpret the numeric scores obtained by the Vitiligo Extent Score (VES). We investigated the interrater reliability of a 5‐point PGA scale during an international vitiligo workshop. Vitiligo experts from five different continents rated photographs of non‐segmental vitiligo patients with varying degrees of extent with the PGA score. Good interrater agreements (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.6) were observed between the raters overall and within each continent. All hypotheses to evaluate construct validity were confirmed. Median VES values per category were for limited 1.10 [IQR: 0.21–1.67], moderate 3.17 [IQR: 1.75–6.21], extensive 9.58 [IQR: 6.21–13.03] and very extensive 42.67 [IQR: 21.20–42.67]. Defined categories for vitiligo extent can be valuable for inclusion criteria and may impact future reimbursement criteria.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI