同行评估
同行反馈
同行评价
心理学
在线课程
在线评估
医学教育
数学教育
同行评审
过程(计算)
高等教育
计算机科学
形成性评价
医学
政治学
操作系统
法学
作者
Ying‐Chih Chen,Chin‐Chung Tsai
标识
DOI:10.1080/14703290802646297
摘要
This study implemented an online peer assessment activity to help 52 Taiwanese in‐service science and mathematics teachers to develop research proposals in an educational research course. The participants were divided into 16 groups, and each group was required to submit a proposal via three rounds of online peer‐assessment activity. This study found that, through the online peer‐assessment activity, the in‐service teachers could enhance their proposals at the initial stage of the activity, but there was almost no substantial improvement at the later stage. In addition, the amount of feedback they obtained was positively related to the performance from the first round to the second round; however, few significant relationships were found from the second to the third round. This study also showed that the process of peer assessment could be used to clarify assessment criteria and that sufficient support from the instructor can maintain participants' attitudes towards this activity, which were relatively optimistic throughout.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI