医学
干预(咨询)
不利影响
临床试验
置信区间
初级保健
优势比
随机对照试验
可能性
结果(博弈论)
重症监护医学
物理疗法
病历
患者安全
急诊医学
临床决策
临床决策支持系统
医疗急救
持续时间(音乐)
梅德林
临床终点
患者参与
治疗组和对照组
家庭医学
意向治疗分析
决策支持系统
控制(管理)
心理干预
作者
Ambrose Agweyu,Paul Mwaniki,Vaishnavi Menon,Robert Korom,Lynda Isaaka,Conrad W. Wanyama,Jaspret Gill,Sarah Kiptinness,Najib Adan,Mira Emmanuel-Fabula,Richard D Riley,Lucinda Archer,Alastair Keith Denniston,Xiaoxuan Liu,Bilal Akhter Mateen
出处
期刊:Nature Medicine
[Nature Portfolio]
日期:2026-06-26
卷期号:32 (8): 3032-3039
被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41591-026-04503-6
摘要
Rigorous evidence on the performance of large language models (LLMs) in real-world, low-resource clinical settings remains limited. Here we conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial in 16 primary care facilities in Kenya. Clinical officers were randomized to use the electronic medical record with or without LLM assistance. The primary outcome was an expert-adjudicated composite of treatment failure events experienced within 14 days of enrollment. Between 22 April and 16 July 2025, 9,691 patients were enrolled, overseen by 103 clinical officers (52 in the LLM-assisted arm and 51 in the control arm). Treatment failure occurred in 102/4,693 patients (2.2%) in the intervention arm and 94/4,654 (2.0%) in the control arm (adjusted odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.08, P = 0.13). The primary outcome did not differ significantly between groups. No serious adverse events were judged related to the intervention, and independent review of the adverse events did not identify a safety signal. In this trial, LLM assistance was safe but did not reduce treatment failure within 14 days and any benefit, if present, is probably modest.Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry: 202502499779176.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI