医学
麻醉
瑞芬太尼
芬太尼
咪唑安定
插管
术前用药
不利影响
随机对照试验
镇静剂
镇静
外科
异丙酚
内科学
作者
Karen Choong,K AlFaleh,Joanne Doucette,Shari Gray,Bonnie Rich,Leonard H. Verhey,Bosco Paes
标识
DOI:10.1136/adc.2009.167338
摘要
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of remifentanil as a premedication in neonates undergoing elective endotracheal intubation. Design
A double-blind randomised controlled trial. Setting
Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit. Patients
Haemodynamically stable term and preterm neonates requiring elective endotracheal intubation. Interventions
Infants in the intervention arm received remifentanil (3 µg/kg) and normal saline placebo. The control group received fentanyl (2 µg/kg) and succinylcholine (2 mg/kg). Both groups also received atropine (20 µg/kg) as part of the premedication regime. Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was time to successful intubation. Secondary outcomes included time to return of spontaneous respirations, oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure changes during the procedure, adverse events and a survey of intubation conditions. Results
A total of 15 infants were randomised to each group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The median time to successful intubation was not statistically different (247 s in the remifentanil group vs 156 s in the fentanyl group, p=0.88). The intubation conditions were rated more favourably with fentanyl by the intubators. Although not statistically significant, chest wall rigidity was observed more commonly with remifentanil. Conclusions
Although remifentanil is comparable to fentanyl and succinylcholine in attenuating adverse physiologic responses during neonatal intubation, muscle rigidity is a concern at doses of 3 µg/kg. Further trials are required to evaluate ideal dosing regimens and combinations of agents for use with remifentanil in neonates.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI