反事实思维
生物多样性
栖息地破坏
环境资源管理
生态系统
生物多样性保护
栖息地
动作(物理)
环境规划
自然资源经济学
地理
生态学
业务
生物
环境科学
经济
心理学
物理
量子力学
社会心理学
作者
Penny F. Langhammer,Joseph W. Bull,Jake E. Bicknell,Joseph Oakley,Mary H. Brown,Michael W. Bruford,Stuart H. M. Butchart,Jamie Carr,D. F. CHURCH,Rosie Cooney,Simone Cutajar,Wendy Foden,Matthew N. Foster,Claude Gascon,Jonas Geldmann,Piero Genovesi,Michael Hoffmann,Jo Howard‐McCombe,Tiffany Lewis,Nicholas B. W. Macfarlane
出处
期刊:Science
[American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)]
日期:2024-04-25
卷期号:384 (6694): 453-458
被引量:134
标识
DOI:10.1126/science.adj6598
摘要
Governments recently adopted new global targets to halt and reverse the loss of biodiversity. It is therefore crucial to understand the outcomes of conservation actions. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 186 studies (including 665 trials) that measured biodiversity over time and compared outcomes under conservation action with a suitable counterfactual of no action. We find that in two-thirds of cases, conservation either improved the state of biodiversity or at least slowed declines. Specifically, we find that interventions targeted at species and ecosystems, such as invasive species control, habitat loss reduction and restoration, protected areas, and sustainable management, are highly effective and have large effect sizes. This provides the strongest evidence to date that conservation actions are successful but require transformational scaling up to meet global targets.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI