医学
传统PCI
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
心肌梗塞
血运重建
冠状动脉疾病
心脏病学
搭桥手术
冠状动脉搭桥手术
内科学
支架
外科
动脉
作者
David J. Cohen,Ruben L.J. Osnabrugge,Elizabeth A. Magnuson,Kaijun Wang,Haiyan Li,Khaja Chinnakondepalli,Duane S. Pinto,Mouin Abdallah,Katherine R. Vilain,Marie‐Claude Morice,Keith D. Dawkins,A. Pieter Kappetein,Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr,Patrick W.J.C. Serruys
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2014-08-02
卷期号:130 (14): 1146-1157
被引量:98
标识
DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.114.009985
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial demonstrated that in patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) was associated with a lower rate of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization compared with percutaneous coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents (DES-PCI)). The long-term cost-effectiveness of these strategies is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2007, 1800 patients with left main or 3-vessel coronary artery disease were randomized to CABG (n=897) or DES-PCI (n=903). Costs were assessed from a US perspective, and health state utilities were evaluated with the EuroQOL questionnaire. A patient-level microsimulation model based on the 5-year in-trial data was used to extrapolate costs, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life expectancy over a lifetime horizon. Although initial procedural costs were $3415 per patient lower with CABG, total hospitalization costs were $10 036 per patient higher. Over the next 5 years, follow-up costs were higher with DES-PCI as a result of more frequent hospitalizations, revascularization procedures, and higher medication costs. Over a lifetime horizon, CABG remained more costly than DES-PCI, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was favorable ($16 537 per quality-adjusted life-year gained) and remained <$20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year in most bootstrap replicates. Results were consistent across a wide range of assumptions about the long-term effect of CABG versus DES-PCI on events and costs. In patients with left main disease or a SYNTAX score ≤22, however, DES-PCI was economically dominant compared with CABG, although these findings were less certain. CONCLUSIONS: For most patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, CABG is a clinically and economically attractive revascularization strategy compared with DES-PCI. However, among patients with less complex disease, DES-PCI may be preferred on both clinical and economic grounds. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00114972.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI