作者
Raul F. Valenzuela,Elvis Duran-Sierra,Minimol Antony,Behrang Amini,Simon S. Lo,Keila E. Torres,Robert S. Benjamin,Jingfei Ma,Ken‐Pin Hwang,R. Jason Stafford,Dejka M. Araujo,Andrew J. Bishop,Ravin Ratan,Wei‐Lien Wang,J. Espinoza,Pía V. Valenzuela,Chengyue Wu,John E. Madewell,William A. Murphy,Colleen M. Costelloe
摘要
Abstract Background Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is the largest subgroup of soft-tissue sarcomas. It demonstrates post-therapeutic hemosiderin deposition, granulation tissue formation, fibrosis, and calcification. Our research aims to establish the multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) value for predicting UPS treatment response. Methods An IRB-approved retrospective study included 33 extremity UPS patients with pre-operative mp-MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted imaging (CE-SWI), and perfusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast-enhancement (PWI/DCE), and surgical resection between February 2021 and May 2023. Lesions were visually classified on CE-SWI into one of 6 morphology patterns. On PWI/DCE, lesions were classified into one of 6 patterns, and time-intensity curves (TICs) were classified as types I-V. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the percentage of pathology-assessed treatment effect (PATE) in the surgical specimen: Responders (> = 90% PATE, n = 16), partial-responders (31–89% PATE, n = 10), and non-responders (< = 30% PATE, n = 7). Results At post-radiation therapy (PRT), a CE-SWI Complete-Ring pattern was observed in 71% of responders ( p = 7.71 × 10 –6 ). On PWI/DCE images, 79% of responders displayed a Capsular pattern ( p = 1.49 × 10 –7 ), and 100% demonstrated a TIC-type II ( p = 8.32 × 10 –7 ). ROC analysis comparing responders ( n = 14) vs. partial/non-responders ( n = 16) at PRT showed that the model combining PWI/DCE TIC-type II, PWI/DCE Capsular pattern, and CE-SWI Complete-Ring pattern yielded the highest classification performance (AUC = 0.99), outperforming PWI/DCE Capsular + TIC-type II (AUC = 0.97), PWI/DCE Capsular (AUC = 0.89), PWI/DCE TIC-type II (AUC = 0.88), and CE-SWI Complete Ring (AUC = 0.79). Contrary to prior reports, DWI/ADC played a secondary role in predicting response: ADC mean & skewness (AUC = 0.63). RECIST demonstrated 100% stability at PRT and 100% pseudo-progression at PC in responders and partial/non-responders (AUC = 0.47). Conclusion Mp-MRI-derived features are valuable in assessing UPS treatment response. A pre-operative model that combines PWI/DCE TIC-type II, PWI/DCE Capsular pattern, and CE-SWI Complete Ring pattern can reliably predict successfully treated UPS with > = 90% PATE, outperforming RECIST, which was proven unreliable in separating responders from partial/non-responders. Institutions that have not yet implemented CE-SWI can rely on a single-sequence approach based on PWI/DCE, combining the presence of TIC II and Capsular enhancement as criteria for response prediction.