Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

医学 相对风险 激素疗法 荟萃分析 内科学 安慰剂 物理疗法 梅德林 置信区间 乳腺癌 癌症 替代医学 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Jane Marjoribanks,Cindy Farquhar,Helen Roberts,Anne Lethaby,Jasmine Lee
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2017 (1) 被引量:420
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd004143.pub5
摘要

BACKGROUND: Hormone therapy (HT) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and dementia in older women. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES: To assess effects of long-term HT (at least 1 year's duration) on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, cancer, gallbladder disease, fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases to September 2016: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We searched the registers of ongoing trials and reference lists provided in previous studies and systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised double-blinded studies of HT versus placebo, taken for at least 1 year by perimenopausal or postmenopausal women. HT included oestrogens, with or without progestogens, via the oral, transdermal, subcutaneous or intranasal route. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the quality of the evidence by using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies involving 43,637 women. We derived nearly 70% of the data from two well-conducted studies (HERS 1998; WHI 1998). Most participants were postmenopausal American women with at least some degree of comorbidity, and mean participant age in most studies was over 60 years. None of the studies focused on perimenopausal women.In relatively healthy postmenopausal women (i.e. generally fit, without overt disease), combined continuous HT increased the risk of a coronary event (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 3 and 7 per 1000), venous thromboembolism (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 4 and 11 per 1000), stroke (after 3 years' use: from 6 per 1000 to between 6 and 12 per 1000), breast cancer (after 5.6 years' use: from 19 per 1000 to between 20 and 30 per 1000), gallbladder disease (after 5.6 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) and death from lung cancer (after 5.6 years' use plus 2.4 years' additional follow-up: from 5 per 1000 to between 6 and 13 per 1000).Oestrogen-only HT increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (after 1 to 2 years' use: from 2 per 1000 to 2 to 10 per 1000; after 7 years' use: from 16 per 1000 to 16 to 28 per 1000), stroke (after 7 years' use: from 24 per 1000 to between 25 and 40 per 1000) and gallbladder disease (after 7 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) but reduced the risk of breast cancer (after 7 years' use: from 25 per 1000 to between 15 and 25 per 1000) and clinical fracture (after 7 years' use: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000) and did not increase the risk of coronary events at any follow-up time.Women over 65 years of age who were relatively healthy and taking continuous combined HT showed an increase in the incidence of dementia (after 4 years' use: from 9 per 1000 to 11 to 30 per 1000). Among women with cardiovascular disease, use of combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (at 1 year's use: from 3 per 1000 to between 3 and 29 per 1000). Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use.Risk of fracture was the only outcome for which strong evidence showed clinical benefit derived from HT (after 5.6 years' use of combined HT: from 111 per 1000 to between 79 and 96 per 1000; after 7.1 years' use of oestrogen-only HT: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000). Researchers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinically meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer.One trial analysed subgroups of 2839 relatively healthy women 50 to 59 years of age who were taking combined continuous HT and 1637 who were taking oestrogen-only HT versus similar-sized placebo groups. The only significantly increased risk reported was for venous thromboembolism in women taking combined continuous HT: Their absolute risk remained low, at less than 1/500. However, other differences in risk cannot be excluded, as this study was not designed to have the power to detect differences between groups of women within 10 years of menopause.For most studies, risk of bias was low in most domains. The overall quality of evidence for the main comparisons was moderate. The main limitation in the quality of evidence was that only about 30% of women were 50 to 59 years old at baseline, which is the age at which women are most likely to consider HT for vasomotor symptoms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT, provided they do not have specific contraindications. HT may be unsuitable for some women, including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, increased risk of thromboembolic disease (such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis) or increased risk of some types of cancer (such as breast cancer, in women with a uterus). The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented.HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia, nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women. Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable. Data are insufficient for assessment of the risk of long-term HT use in perimenopausal women and in postmenopausal women younger than 50 years of age.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
太白发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
JFma完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
Ava应助顺心毛巾采纳,获得30
4秒前
zoe666发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
JJbond发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
无敌大忽悠完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
杨科发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
SPARKLING完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
兴奋的寒天完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
可可应助arniu2008采纳,获得30
9秒前
molihuakai应助无心的梦蕊采纳,获得10
9秒前
啊哦完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
zoe666完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
我是老大应助鹏哥爱科研采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
完美世界应助cara33采纳,获得10
11秒前
内向灵凡完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
pengnanhao完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
Owen应助善良的翼采纳,获得10
13秒前
Godzilla完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
承乐完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
浮云应助ywhys采纳,获得10
15秒前
朱朱朱完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
pan完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
浮云应助十三不靠采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
Godzilla发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
molihuakai应助杨科采纳,获得10
16秒前
李健的小迷弟应助cwm采纳,获得10
17秒前
niki完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
威武青亦发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6528327
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8321462
关于积分的说明 17814181
捐赠科研通 5630006
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2930719
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1907454
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1766795