Comparison of second-generation hydrogel embolic coils and bare platinum coils in ruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study

作者
Seung Pil Ban,O-Ki Kwon,Young Deok Kim,Hwan Seok Shim,Seung Bin Sung,Chang Hyeun Kim,Hyoung Soo Byoun
出处
期刊:Neurosurgical Review [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:49 (1)
标识
DOI:10.1007/s10143-026-04212-1
摘要

To reduce the recurrence of cerebral aneurysms, second-generation hydrogel embolic coils (HECs) have been developed. We aimed to compare the impacts of bare platinum coils (BPCs) and HECs on the recurrence of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs). In this study, participants with an RIA were randomly assigned to the BPC or HEC group at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was any recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. The secondary outcomes included retreatment, procedural complications, delayed cerebral ischemia, favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2), ventriculoperitoneal shunt operation, and the coil’s ease of manipulation. After excluding 11 patients, 57 patients were ultimately included for analysis (BPC, n = 26; HEC, n = 31). The primary outcome was not statistically significant between 2 groups (BPC group: 10/26 [38.5%]; HEC group: 6/31 [19.4%]; P = 0.144). The secondary outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups, except for the coil’s ease of manipulation (P = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the primary outcome (rate of recurrence [OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.13–1.61; P = 0.223]) or in terms of the secondary outcomes, including retreatment (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.12-5.00; P = 0.766), favorable clinical outcomes (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.16–6.90; P = 0.957), or VP shunt operation (OR = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01–1.54; P = 0.102). Among patients who underwent coil embolization for an RIA, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rates of recurrence, retreatment, favorable clinical outcomes or VP shunt operation during the 12-month follow-up period. Given the small sample size, these results should be interpreted with caution. This study is a registered clinical trial. It was prospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04988503) on July 23, 2021.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6666发布了新的文献求助200
1秒前
2秒前
凡人修仙传完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
活泼元冬发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
huahuayu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
阿南完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
戴苏的应助被墨斗在拼搏采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
研友_ndv5j8完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
样子完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被谨慎笑阳采纳,获得10
6秒前
鲜于灵竹完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
卢星彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
慧海拾穗发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
辛勤的纸飞机完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
辛勤的囧完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
坦率天德发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
笑点低的达完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
huangliulan完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
有魅力强炫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
hu发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
丘比特的应助被心念采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
LAN完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
Youdge的应助被xiaolizi采纳,获得20
15秒前
16秒前
haihai完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
专注小平完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
田様的应助被欣喜的莫茗采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8045216
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9476454
关于积分的说明 21284452
捐赠科研通 7612587
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3392158
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2523632
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2430095