Multicancer Detection Tests for Screening

医学 医学物理学
作者
Leila C. Kahwati,Matthew R. Avenarius,Leslie Brouwer,Norah L. Crossnohere,Chyke A. Doubeni,Cecelia Miller,Mariam Siddiqui,Christiane Voisin,Roberta Wines,Daniel E Jonas
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
标识
DOI:10.7326/annals-25-01877
摘要

Screening for multiple types of cancer with a single blood test is potentially transformative. To assess the benefits, accuracy, and harms of screening with blood-based multicancer detection (MCD) tests in asymptomatic adults. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, trial registries, and relevant websites through March 2025. Controlled studies of MCD tests (for example, cell-free DNA) in asymptomatic populations reporting cancer detection, mortality, quality of life, and harms (psychosocial, adverse events, decrease in standard-of-care screening); uncontrolled studies for harms of diagnostic evaluation; test accuracy studies. One reviewer extracted data; a second checked for accuracy; 2 reviewers independently assessed risk of bias (ROB) and strength of evidence. No controlled studies evaluated benefits of screening. Twenty studies (n = 109 177) reported accuracy for 19 MCD tests. Seven studies (5 with high ROB, 2 of unclear ROB) reported the accuracy of future cancer detection in asymptomatic persons followed for 1 year (prediagnostic performance); the rest estimated accuracy from high ROB case-control studies in clinically confirmed cancer cases and healthy, cancer-free, control participants (diagnostic performance). Across tests, sensitivity ranged from 0.095 to 0.998, specificity ranged from 0.657 to 1.0, and area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.52 to 1.0. Sensitivity and AUC were higher in diagnostic performance compared with prediagnostic performance studies. No other patterns in accuracy were discernible. One cohort study reported harms; however, these data were limited. English-language studies only. Heterogeneity precluded quantitative synthesis of accuracy; estimates from the diagnostic performance studies may not be applicable to screening. No controlled studies are completed that report benefits of screening with MCD tests; evidence was judged insufficient to evaluate harms and accuracy. Accuracy varies by test and study design. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42024570793).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
孔旭完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
传奇3应助GBY采纳,获得10
8秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
迅哥发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
33完成签到 ,获得积分20
14秒前
AY完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
酸奶蛋糕完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
沉静傥发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Aa发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
求助发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
LZZ完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Ava应助zzz采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
隐形羿完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
李爆发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
清脆宛筠完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
cdercder应助Aa采纳,获得10
22秒前
在鹿特丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
li完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
柴智浩发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
峰成发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
29秒前
29秒前
29秒前
31秒前
东北雨哥给小小的紫蛋的求助进行了留言
31秒前
32秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7287191
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907136
关于积分的说明 18850189
捐赠科研通 6956217
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208523
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378495
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184225