Is Pooled Data Analysis of Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair Acceptable?

作者
Ferdinand Köckerling,Christine Schug-Paß,Daniela Adolf,W. Reinpold,B. Stechemesser
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Surgery [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:2: 15-15 被引量:56
标识
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00015
摘要

PURPOSE: In meta-analyses and systematic reviews comparing laparoscopic with open repair of ventral hernias, data on umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias are pooled. Based on data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry, we aimed to investigate whether the differences in the therapy and treatment results justified such an approach. METHODS: Between 1st September 2009 and 31st August 2013, 31,664 patients with a ventral hernia were enrolled in the Herniamed Hernia Registry. The implicated hernias included 16,206 umbilical hernias, 3,757 epigastric hernias, and 11,701 incisional hernias. Data on the surgical techniques, postoperative complication rates, and 1-year follow-up results were subjected to statistical analysis to identify any significant differences between the various hernia types. RESULTS: The laparoscopic IPOM technique was used significantly more often for incisional hernia than for epigastric hernia, 31.3 vs. 24.0%, respectively, and was used for 12.9% of umbilical hernias (p < 0.0001). Likewise, the open technique with suturing of defect was used significantly more often for umbilical hernia than for epigastric hernia, 56.1 vs. 35.4%, respectively, and was used for 12.5% of incisional hernias (p < 0.0001). The postoperative complication rates of 3.2% for umbilical hernia and 3.5% for epigastric hernia were significantly lower than for incisional hernia, at 9.2% (p < 0.0001). That was also true for the reoperation rates due to postoperative complications, of 1.0 vs. 1.2 vs. 4.2% (p < 0.0001). The 1-year follow-up revealed significantly higher recurrence rates as well as rates of chronic pain needing treatment of 6.3 and 7.9%, respectively, for incisional hernia, compared with 4.1 and 4.3%, respectively, for epigastric hernia, and 2 and 1.9%, respectively, for umbilical hernia (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Since significant differences were identified in the therapy and treatment results between umbilical hernia, epigastric hernia, and incisional hernia, scientific studies should be conducted comparing the various surgical techniques only for a single hernia type.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cheng完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
12305014077完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
光亮的元容完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
朱洪帆发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
鲑鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
在水一方应助微笑猎豹采纳,获得10
6秒前
tszjw168发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
hr完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
coolru完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
独特的高山完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助青奴采纳,获得10
8秒前
淋巴细胞发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
zfh发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
DavidWebb发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
nn完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
很有用发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Nokia发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
木齐Jay完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
潇洒的大神完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
复杂的孤容完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
ASCC完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
Bassvv完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
nxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
zhishi完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
科研通AI6.4应助蓝天采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
Timon完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Seagull完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Faier完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
玛琳卡迪马完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
YP发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Chemistry, 5th Edition 1000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7371749
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8979414
关于积分的说明 19090258
捐赠科研通 7013639
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3225119
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2388700
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2205764