Is Pooled Data Analysis of Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair Acceptable?

作者
Ferdinand Köckerling,Christine Schug-Paß,Daniela Adolf,Wolfgang Matthias Johann Reinpold,B. Stechemesser
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Surgery [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:2: 15-15 被引量:56
标识
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00015
摘要

PURPOSE: In meta-analyses and systematic reviews comparing laparoscopic with open repair of ventral hernias, data on umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias are pooled. Based on data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry, we aimed to investigate whether the differences in the therapy and treatment results justified such an approach. METHODS: Between 1st September 2009 and 31st August 2013, 31,664 patients with a ventral hernia were enrolled in the Herniamed Hernia Registry. The implicated hernias included 16,206 umbilical hernias, 3,757 epigastric hernias, and 11,701 incisional hernias. Data on the surgical techniques, postoperative complication rates, and 1-year follow-up results were subjected to statistical analysis to identify any significant differences between the various hernia types. RESULTS: The laparoscopic IPOM technique was used significantly more often for incisional hernia than for epigastric hernia, 31.3 vs. 24.0%, respectively, and was used for 12.9% of umbilical hernias (p < 0.0001). Likewise, the open technique with suturing of defect was used significantly more often for umbilical hernia than for epigastric hernia, 56.1 vs. 35.4%, respectively, and was used for 12.5% of incisional hernias (p < 0.0001). The postoperative complication rates of 3.2% for umbilical hernia and 3.5% for epigastric hernia were significantly lower than for incisional hernia, at 9.2% (p < 0.0001). That was also true for the reoperation rates due to postoperative complications, of 1.0 vs. 1.2 vs. 4.2% (p < 0.0001). The 1-year follow-up revealed significantly higher recurrence rates as well as rates of chronic pain needing treatment of 6.3 and 7.9%, respectively, for incisional hernia, compared with 4.1 and 4.3%, respectively, for epigastric hernia, and 2 and 1.9%, respectively, for umbilical hernia (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Since significant differences were identified in the therapy and treatment results between umbilical hernia, epigastric hernia, and incisional hernia, scientific studies should be conducted comparing the various surgical techniques only for a single hernia type.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cs完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
CipherSage的应助被lmq采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
5秒前
华仔的应助被尼可采纳,获得10
5秒前
萂昕完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
英姑的应助被健康的幻珊采纳,获得10
7秒前
自由的舞蹈完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
sxl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
香蕉觅云的应助被jc采纳,获得10
9秒前
tyrurty发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
大橘子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
易安完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
万能图书馆的应助被方啊啊采纳,获得10
10秒前
巴黎没有摩天轮完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
萱棚发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
lmq发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
尼可完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
尼可发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
伊布发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
tuanheqi的应助被lingua采纳,获得300
22秒前
陈十三发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
橘柚完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
Yu完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
26秒前
Hana发布了新的文献求助100
28秒前
目土土完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
香锅完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
煜宁HY发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
炸鸡腿完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
乐乐的应助被liangwanwan采纳,获得10
35秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7818057
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9346374
关于积分的说明 20535745
捐赠科研通 7410633
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3331859
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2478233
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2351612