Is Pooled Data Analysis of Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair Acceptable?

作者
Ferdinand Köckerling,Christine Schug-Paß,Daniela Adolf,W. Reinpold,B. Stechemesser
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Surgery [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:2: 15-15 被引量:56
标识
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00015
摘要

PURPOSE: In meta-analyses and systematic reviews comparing laparoscopic with open repair of ventral hernias, data on umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias are pooled. Based on data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry, we aimed to investigate whether the differences in the therapy and treatment results justified such an approach. METHODS: Between 1st September 2009 and 31st August 2013, 31,664 patients with a ventral hernia were enrolled in the Herniamed Hernia Registry. The implicated hernias included 16,206 umbilical hernias, 3,757 epigastric hernias, and 11,701 incisional hernias. Data on the surgical techniques, postoperative complication rates, and 1-year follow-up results were subjected to statistical analysis to identify any significant differences between the various hernia types. RESULTS: The laparoscopic IPOM technique was used significantly more often for incisional hernia than for epigastric hernia, 31.3 vs. 24.0%, respectively, and was used for 12.9% of umbilical hernias (p < 0.0001). Likewise, the open technique with suturing of defect was used significantly more often for umbilical hernia than for epigastric hernia, 56.1 vs. 35.4%, respectively, and was used for 12.5% of incisional hernias (p < 0.0001). The postoperative complication rates of 3.2% for umbilical hernia and 3.5% for epigastric hernia were significantly lower than for incisional hernia, at 9.2% (p < 0.0001). That was also true for the reoperation rates due to postoperative complications, of 1.0 vs. 1.2 vs. 4.2% (p < 0.0001). The 1-year follow-up revealed significantly higher recurrence rates as well as rates of chronic pain needing treatment of 6.3 and 7.9%, respectively, for incisional hernia, compared with 4.1 and 4.3%, respectively, for epigastric hernia, and 2 and 1.9%, respectively, for umbilical hernia (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Since significant differences were identified in the therapy and treatment results between umbilical hernia, epigastric hernia, and incisional hernia, scientific studies should be conducted comparing the various surgical techniques only for a single hernia type.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
4秒前
abcaaa应助wuyanfei采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
白羽完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
李爱国应助linman采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
虚心的夏青完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
标致的mm发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
季生发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
白羽发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
loen完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
17秒前
苏紫梗桔完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
OK应助大神水瓶座采纳,获得10
21秒前
高高亿先发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
木子李完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
mmmm发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
无语的乐双完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
诚心的海白完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
淡淡的问筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
27秒前
俭朴苑博应助JC采纳,获得10
28秒前
笨笨山芙给真实的一鸣的求助进行了留言
29秒前
大风发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
科研通AI2S应助IRISR采纳,获得50
30秒前
英姑应助qing采纳,获得10
31秒前
fsu2580应助mirutio采纳,获得10
32秒前
Accept2024发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
猫小乐C完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
完美世界应助狗蛋采纳,获得10
33秒前
粗暴的火车完成签到 ,获得积分20
34秒前
洁净的千凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
得意黑完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
JC完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Chemistry, 5th Edition 1000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7371556
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8979232
关于积分的说明 19089813
捐赠科研通 7013523
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3225088
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2388685
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2205764