亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Stenting Versus Medical Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial

医学 冲程(发动机) 四分位间距 随机对照试验 危险系数 狭窄 围手术期 外科 内科学 置信区间 机械工程 工程类
作者
Peng Gao,Xiaoxin He,Haibo Wang,Tao Wang,Daming Wang,Huaizhang Shi,Tianxiao Li,Zhenwei Zhao,Yiling Cai,Wei Wu,Wilson He,Jia Yu,Bingjie Zheng,Xuebing Feng,Colin P. Derdeyn,Adam A. Dmytriw,Yangfeng Wu,Guoguang Zhao,Liqun Jiao
出处
期刊:Stroke [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.124.049602
摘要

BACKGROUND: Whether the long-term benefit of stroke prevention when stenting is added to medical therapy (MT) over MT alone for symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis offsets the perioperative risks of the stenting has not been directly evaluated in a randomized trial. We aimed to compare the long-term (>3 years) effect of stenting versus MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis in a randomized trial. METHODS: We extended the follow-up of 358 subjects enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted at 8 centers in China. Patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke attributed to severe intracranial stenosis (70% to 99%) were recruited between March 5, 2014, and November 10, 2016. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days. Other secondary outcomes included stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery, as well as disabling stroke or death after enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients (stenting 176 versus MT 182) were recruited from March 5, 2014, and followed up till January 22, 2024. The median duration of follow-up was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 6.0–8.0). The primary outcome was not significantly different (stenting 14.8% versus MT 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58–1.77]; P =0.97). No significant difference was found between groups for the secondary outcomes: stroke in the territory of qualifying artery (14.8% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58–1.77]; P =0.97), disabling stroke or death (16.5% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.66–1.91]; P =0.70), and death (9.1% versus 7.1%; hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.58–2.58]; P =0.60). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides compelling evidence that, even over prolonged observed periods, the addition of stenting to MT does not confer additional benefits to MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis. These results underscore the importance of MT as the cornerstone of long-term stroke prevention in this patient population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01763320.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
11秒前
15秒前
16秒前
didi发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
miku1完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
30秒前
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
42秒前
20011013完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
情怀应助miku1采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
miku1发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助100
1分钟前
2分钟前
obedVL完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
势临完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
汉堡包应助999采纳,获得30
2分钟前
Hello应助Yvette2024采纳,获得10
2分钟前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
曾经沛白完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
过氧化氢完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
MMMMM完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
DreamMaker完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
小马甲应助诚心文博采纳,获得10
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
4分钟前
酷波er应助cc采纳,获得10
4分钟前
Yvette2024发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
诚心文博发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
Yvette2024完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Semantics for Latin: An Introduction 1099
Biology of the Indian Stingless Bee: Tetragonula iridipennis Smith 1000
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 740
2024-2030年中国石英材料行业市场竞争现状及未来趋势研判报告 500
镇江南郊八公洞林区鸟类生态位研究 500
Thermal Quadrupoles: Solving the Heat Equation through Integral Transforms 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4142874
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3679083
关于积分的说明 11627763
捐赠科研通 3372547
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1852392
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 915180
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 829680