扫描仪
印象
标准差
计算机科学
计算机图形学(图像)
口腔正畸科
数学
人工智能
医学
统计
万维网
作者
Yousif A. Al‐Dulaijan,Haidar Alalawi,Mohammed M. Gad,Faisal D. al‐Qarni,Shaimaa M. Fouda,Passent Ellakany
出处
期刊:PeerJ
[PeerJ, Inc.]
日期:2025-02-26
卷期号:13: e19075-e19075
被引量:7
摘要
The overall trueness, Medit had the highest deviation compared to the VPS and TRIOS groups with a P value of 0.0013 and <0.0001, respectively. In terms of overall precision, TRIOS had a lower deviation than the VPS group, with a P value of 0.0002. The TRIOS and Medit groups had statistically comparable results. The desktop scanner showed the highest precision in digitizing completely edentulous cases, followed by the TRIOS scanner. The Medit scanner's trueness had the highest deviation compared to the VPS and TRIOS groups.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI