医学
重症监护医学
糖化血红蛋白
2型糖尿病
糖尿病
1型糖尿病
生活质量(医疗保健)
医疗保健
临床试验
内科学
2型糖尿病
护理部
政治学
法学
内分泌学
作者
Klara R. Klein,John B. Buse
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41574-020-00425-6
摘要
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is considered the gold standard for predicting glycaemia-associated risks for the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes mellitus over 5-10 years. The value of HbA1c in the care of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unassailable, yet HbA1c targets remain contentious. Guidelines from diabetes care organizations recommend conflicting HbA1c targets - generally between 6.5% and 8%. However, all such organizations advocate for individualization of HbA1c targets, leaving both health-care providers and their patients confused about what HbA1c target is appropriate in an individual patient. In this Review, we outline the landmark T1DM and T2DM trials that informed the current guidelines, we discuss the evidence that drives individualized HbA1c targets, we examine the limitations of HbA1c, and we consider alternatives for monitoring glycaemic control. Ultimately, in synthesizing this literature, we argue for an HbA1c target of <7% for most individuals, but emphasize the importance of helping patients determine their own personal goals and determinants of quality of life that are independent of a particular glycaemic target. We also recognize that as newer technologies and anti-hyperglycaemic therapies emerge, glycaemic targets will continue to evolve.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI