Ranolazine for improving coronary microvascular function in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Microvascular dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease is increasingly being recognized as an important health issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of ranolazine, an antianginal agent, in improving coronary microvascular function. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and gray literature databases until September 30, 2023. The included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English or Chinese languages that screened for eligibility using two independent investigators. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane) and Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp). Results: From 1,470 citations, 8 RCTs involving 379 participants were included in this analysis. Our findings showed that ranolazine increased coronary flow reserve (CFR) over an 8 to 12-week follow-up period [standardized mean difference =1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4–1.89; P=0.002]. Ranolazine increased the global myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) [weighted mean difference (WMD) =0.18; 95% CI: 0.07–0.29; P=0.002] and the midsubendocardial MPRI (WMD =0.10; 95% CI: 0.02–0.19; P=0.02). Moreover, ranolazine improved 3 of the 5 Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, namely, physical functioning (WMD =4.89; 95% CI: 0.14 to 9.64; P=0.04), angina stability (WMD =17.31; 95% CI: 7.13–27.49; P=0.0009), and quality of life (WMD =10.11; 95% CI: 3.57–16.65; P=0.0003). Trial sequential analysis showed that the meta-analysis of angina stability and quality of life scores had a sufficient sample size and statistical power. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that ranolazine is associated with improvements in CFR, myocardial perfusion, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. However, further large-scale RCTs with long-term follow-up are recommended to validate these findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of ranolazine on coronary microvascular function.