Predicting Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

医学 指南 统计的 队列 肺动脉高压 内科学 队列研究 弗雷明翰风险评分 风险评估 疾病 重症监护医学 急诊医学 统计 病理 计算机科学 计算机安全 数学
作者
Raymond L. Benza,Mardi Gomberg‐Maitland,Cynthia Elliott,Harrison W. Farber,Aimee J. Foreman,Adaani Frost,Michael D. McGoon,David J. Pasta,Mona Selej,Charles D. Burger,Robert P. Frantz
出处
期刊:Chest [Elsevier]
卷期号:156 (2): 323-337 被引量:421
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.004
摘要

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease. Published treatment guidelines recommend treatment escalation on the basis of regular patient assessment with the goal of achieving or maintaining low-risk status. Various strategies are available to determine risk status. This analysis describes an update of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator (REVEAL 2.0) and compares it with recently published European Society of Cardiology/Respiratory Society guideline-derived risk assessment strategies.A subpopulation from the US-based registry REVEAL that survived ≥ 1 year postenrollment (baseline for this cohort) was analyzed. For REVEAL 2.0, point values and cutpoints were reassessed, and new variables were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival at 12 months postbaseline; discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic. Mortality estimates and discrimination were compared between REVEAL 2.0 and Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (FPHR) risk assessment strategies. For this comparison, a three-category REVEAL 2.0 score was computed in which patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk.REVEAL 2.0 demonstrated similar discrimination as the original calculator in this subpopulation (c-statistic = 0.76 vs 0.74), provided excellent separation of risk among the risk categories, and predicted clinical worsening as well as mortality in patients who were followed ≥ 1 year. The REVEAL 2.0 three-category score had greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.73) than COMPERA (c-statistic = 0.62) or FPHR (c-statistic = 0.64). Compared with REVEAL 2.0, COMPERA and FPHR both underestimated and overestimated risk.REVEAL 2.0 demonstrates greater risk discrimination than the COMPERA and FPHR risk assessment strategies in patients enrolled in REVEAL. After external validation, the REVEAL 2.0 calculator can assist clinicians and patients in making informed treatment decisions on the basis of individual risk profiles.ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
一蓑烟雨任平生完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
奋斗青完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
忧郁的醉蓝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
soar完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
秋雪瑶应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
研友_nPbeR8发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
孝顺的凝珍关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
脑洞疼应助激昂的背包采纳,获得10
10秒前
我是老大应助Lee采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
研友_nPbeR8完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
20秒前
FashionBoy应助anita0303采纳,获得30
20秒前
激昂的背包完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
乐乐应助xiaojingyang0802采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
魏阳虹发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
孝顺的凝珍发布了新的文献求助200
25秒前
zx发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
大胆的渊思完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
punctuation完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
四月发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
鱼鱼发布了新的文献求助20
27秒前
爆米花应助钱浩采纳,获得10
31秒前
33秒前
四月完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2480007
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2142526
关于积分的说明 5463429
捐赠科研通 1865375
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 927318
版权声明 562922
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 496168